20240515_Connection&Flow_pen
i.e., the answer to the things we need to know about can be found in everything.
When we know that everything is connected to everything else, how is it fair that we examine anything in isolation?
If the structure of society is similar to a mother network with numerous points and countless interpretations of those points, is it fair that we specialize in studying a particular point alone? And the particular line connecting the nodes in this space-time continuum?
Or do we need to analyze the larger outline connecting those nodes, where different patterns emerge at every inspection of the data?
Do we focus more on the order of our research, the precision with which we read between the different lines, each time tapping into the contextual array behind all the sensory information available to us?
Doesn't each successive attempt to understand our broader reality lead us to a more concrete description of our time in this expanding/collapsing universe?
Doesn't our never-ending cycle of creation and destruction point to the eternal fluidity adopted by the atoms around us, and subsequently, human nature itself?
[P.S I'm glad I feel this way; my curiosity for life manifests in ways such that specificity can never narrow down the truths I seek.]